In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas

The Medical Establishment . . .

How many doctors – like John and James Hunter – and scientists have been mistreated or just sidelined because they discovered something new, only to be subsequently rehabilitated into the churches of science and medicine? Hence the saying, in necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas  (lit. unity in necessaries, liberty in doubts, charity in all.), attributed to Marco Antonio de Dominis, the Archbishop of Split in his anti-Papal De Republica Ecclesiastica, in 1617 is apt.

Despite the Covid-era being a time of doubt – and damn lies and falsehoods – beginning with inaccurate ‘scientific’ modelling (see William Briggs’ post, for example and here), notably at Imperial College, London, there was no liberty in the establishment’s doubtfulness, no charity for all and for Dr Ralph, Dr de Brun and others, the lack of unity was not to be tolerated.

Hence, the Medical Council has found Dr Ralph guilty of professional misconduct over ‘dangerous’ Covid-19 posts (sounds like a slippery slope argument). Is a post more dangerous than the vaccines they pushed? Here we are a few years later and still young men and women are dying from clots, aggressive cancers, with ‘unusual tissue’ to quote one breast surgeon (An unusual effect has to have an unusual cause; the effect is in the cause.), and the tragedy continues. I know many surgeons and a consultant physician who are seriously ill since they accepted the vaccines. I know of a female GP this side of Galway and a consultant psychiatrist in Roscommon who developed serious problems post-vaccine. Another consultant physician told me, when I met him in the local garden centre, he knew five consultants who were very ill after being vaccinated, one having Reiter’s Syndrome, he emphasised. Did anyone else hear this? Why not? An Indian doctor retired early from his work in Victoria, S. Australia due to Hashimoto’s disease. He blamed the vaccine, which, he said, ‘hadn’t been tested properly’.

There were many vaccines, including Chinese, and Russian, so which one, if any, was the scientific one, because they can’t all be scientific?

How about this advice from the golden boy of the Covid era? I was listening to Midwest Radio one Thursday morning when Dr Luke O’Neill was in the studio to convince everyone to get vaccinated (he was late taking the vaccine himself, as was Albert Burla, CEO of Pfizer, which was why he was refused entry into Israel). He wasn’t there to give objective scientific advice, which is evident from what I heard. The Astra Zeneca/Oxford vaccine had just been taken off the market in Ireland for people over sixty. A lady phoned in and told Professor O’Neill she had her first dose of this two-dose vaccine two weeks ago, but had now turned sixty and asked what should she now do about the final dose. Snookered, he dodged the answer with the most amazing untruth: ‘Ah Jayz, that vaccine is 100% guaranteed to save your life.’ No it wasn’t, and even the Oxford scientists who developed that vaccine never made that claim. In fact, the Oxford scientists were probably secretly anxious about the safety of their vaccine because they advised the British government not to administer a ‘booster dose’. And herein is another dangerous policy introduced by politicians as much, or more so, than the medics. There was no such thing as a ‘booster dose’. It was a two-dose vaccine (or one in the case of the Johnson vaccine), not a two-dose plus, plus. . . ‘Booster’ is not the language of science, and a booster dose was not and is still not scientific. It was an act of desperation when the establishment realised the vaccines were not ‘97% effective’, to quote the lie (wasn’t that dangerous to lure people into a false sense of security?), but at best had a positive effect – for some – of three months max. The establishment had to keep throwing the vaccine mud at the wall in the hope something would stick.

Midwest Radio wouldn’t tolerate dissent either; they were given about €203,000, in a few traunches, like other regional radio stations, just to ‘help them’ during the pandemic. That’s apart from the HSE advertising revenue they received.

In fact the CDC felt compelled to redefine the definition of vaccination from providing immunisation to providing resistence, or some such vague, elastic term. Doesn’t that show the confidence they had in their medical system and products. . . ?

If the Medical Council is so concerned about Dr Billy Ralph’s posts, then surely everyone should be concerned by the Irish Medical Council’s update in 2024 to their code of ethics, when they removed the sentence: ‘A doctor may not take part in the killing of their patient.” Why? Now, isn’t this a dangerous act?  Then President, Suzanne Crowe, is accused of refusing to answer why on a number of occassions this and other sentences had been removed.

Dr Ralph is found guilty of being critical and not very nice to Nphet staff. I know a lot of doctors who had more contempt for them than Dr Ralph. One consultant said Dr Houlihan should be reported to the Medical Council because his job was not to make announcements but to advise the government. He believed Houlihan was not qualified for the job, having published little, having only the equivalent of a MA degree and never having worked outside Ireland. Dr Ralph was critical of administering the covid vaccine to children. So! So were other doctors, one commenting it is a disgrace no paediatrician dissented over vaccinating children because they are not susceptible to the  Sars-Cov-2 virus. There are now children who became cardiac patients as a result. One lady phoned me from Ballina to tell me her 18-year-old son couldn’t breath since the vaccine. She further explained his whole class is the same. So why did no one have a duty of care, a conscience about this and speak up?

If I were you, I’d be more frightened by the medical establishment’s thinking and doing than Dr Billy’s posts.

You can listen to an interview with Dr Billy Ralph on South East Radio here:

https://www.southeastradio.ie/podcasts/morning-mix/episode/thursday-13th-august-2026/?autoplay=1